“Christianity and Rabbinic Judaism: Surprising Differences, Conflicting Visions, and Worldview Implications” by Jonas E. Alexis (Part 3)

Standard

Goldman wasn’t really seeking to destroy government altogether; she later declared that she only revolted against certain forms of government. “Anarchism, then, really stands for the liberation of the human mind from the dominion of religion; the liberation of the human body from the dominion of property; liberation from the shackles and restraint of government. Anarchism stands for a social order based on the free grouping of individuals for the purpose of producing real social wealth; an order that will guarantee to every human being free access to the earth and full enjoyment of the necessities of life, according to individual desires, tastes, and inclinations”…

Why do revolutionary Jews such as Goldman hold such contempt for Christianity? According to Moses Hess, Jewish revolutionaries are supposed to break taboos and cross boundaries.

This is survival of the fittest applied to human beings, with the strong eliminating the weak. Galton made it clear that one of the goals of eugenics is to give “the more suitable races or strains of blood a better chance of prevailing speedily over the less suitable.” He even declared in Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development that “natural selection improves a race.” And how did he believe eugenics should be applied to improve a race? “Whenever a low race is preserved under conditions of life that exact a high level of efficiency, it must be subjected to rigorous selection. The few best specimens of that race can alone be allowed to become parents, and not many of their descendants can be allowed to live. The most merciful form of what I ventured to call ‘eugenics’ would consist in watching for the indications of superior strains or races, and in so favouring them that their progeny shall outnumber and gradually replace that of the old one.”

During the Obama administration, claims have been made that Rahm Emmanuel, David Axelrod, and others are “running the White House.” Alan Dershowitz states, “Obama is surrounded by Jewish advisers who understand how Israel works, and even has a senior adviser with an Israeli background.”

In light of what Truman experienced in the White House, he said, “The Jews, I find, are very, very selfish. When they have power, physical, financial, or political, neither Hitler nor Stalin has anything on them for cruelty or mistreatment of the underdog.” Although Truman was by no means anti-Semitic, he is still paying the price for expressing his views out loud. Abraham Foxman silenced Truman’s objections by declaring that Truman “was capable of the most sordid anti-Semitic attitudes,” and proved that “strong anti-Semitic attitudes were in the United States during the 1930s and 1940s.”

Instead of reassessing the hemorrhage of foreign aid that is bleeding America dry, U.S. congressmen are flocking to show support for Israel. In August 2011, 55 Republican and 26 Democratic congressmen pledged to visit to Israel.102 This even shocked Tel Aviv journalist Mya Guarnieri, who wrote, “The American economy is in a crisis. Suburbs are falling into poverty. Schools are struggling. Cities teeter on the edge of bankruptcy. And 81 U.S. Congressmen are off in Israel when they should be here, dealing with the mountain of problems facing the American people— you know, the men and women who elected them.”

The doctrine was the issue, not the Pharisees, who could have been regenerated by Christ’s power. Paul was a Pharisee, yet he became Christianity’s most devoted proponent. The doctrine we are talking about here—Rabbinic Judaism—begins by rejecting Christ and His words, and therefore makes its adherents theological Christ-rejecters. Even Alan Dershowitz and Jacob Neusner indirectly affirm that sentiment…

The issue then, is not about whether your mother was Jewish, or whether your parents died in the Holocaust, or whether you are Orthodox or Reformed. The issue revolves around whether you believe in Jesus as the Messiah. In a nutshell, the Law of Return—a law that allows Jews the right to return and settle in Israel—which was passed in 1950 and states that “every Jew has the right to come to this country [Israel] as an oleh,” does not apply to ethnic Jews who are Christians. The law was even extended to people who have only Jewish grandparents, but apparently not to full-blooded Jews who happen to be Christians.

In a nutshell, by discriminating against messianic Jews, the Israeli government just proves that this is not an ethnic issue or every person of Jewish descent would be granted citizenship. The issue is almost exclusively theological—one that the gospel of John addresses head-on. The early church was largely persecuted for this reason through the first and second centuries. The Apostle John picks up these themes again in his other epistles. “Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son” (1 John 2:22). (Yet, even discussing these issues on a theological foundation only, one is likely to be called an anti-Semite even in some evangelical circles.)

If people are still hanging onto the Old Testament promise made in Genesis, who is going to determine the “Jews” who need to be blessed? Does this include theJews who promoted Communism and Bolshevism or started revolutionary movements, like Freud, Maslow, Marx, Trotsky, and Kun? Even in the Old Testament, God never blessed Israel when Israel was in rebellion against His words and His prophets.

As we have already seen, they went into captivity numerous times because of their constant rebellion. During the time of Elijah, God stopped the rain for over three years because the people of Israel refused to listen to His prophets. What if the nation still refuses to listen to God’s only Son? Are we willing to say that God is still going bless America because America blesses those who categorically refused to listen to God’s only Son?

Once again, we see that Christ is being replaced with national Israel. According to this reasoning, all American has to do in order to be blessed of God is to give unconditional support to Israel, a ridiculous idea that is not even mentioned in the New Testament…

Man is in a sorry state because he rejects Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the very existence of his being. When that happens, man will try to abandon God’s principles and solve his own problems by making up his own principles, which in nearly all cases turns out to be a complete disaster, especially on a nationwide scale. The only real solution to sanity, peace, and harmony among all the so-called races is for man to return to Christ—nothing else will do…

As I have noted over and over, from a Christian perspective it is quite clear: Jews are in rebellion against Jesus Christ, and by embracing Talmudic theology they had to embrace revolutionary activity, which has always turned out to be detrimental for them. Christians cannot promote or endorse anti-Semitism. The best the true Christian can do is to pray for the Jews so that “god peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth; And that they may recover themselves out of the snare of the devil, who are taken captive by him at his will” (2 Timothy 2:25-26).

In fact, nearly all the founders of the neoconservative movement were Trotskyists… Irving Kristol, like the other New York intellectuals, was dissatisfied with what he called “traditional American conservatism” and the liberalism of the radical left. He therefore chose to promote Harrington’s new ideology of neoconservatism, jokingly declaring that a neoconservative is “a liberal who has been mugged by reality.”

But Kristol’s deep-seated convictions and beliefs reveal that this new movement, at its core, does not reference ultimate truth as embodied in the person of Christ, the Logos who defines human existence and destiny. Kristol’s ideas are Utopian without a central backbone of ultimate truth; even though some of the ideas may be good in the here and now, they have no ultimate meaning and purpose in eternity…

Yet if that is the case, then what really is behind the neoconservative movement? Very simply,Jewish ideology and revolutionary activity…

This “new kind of conservative politics” is nothing short of a Jewish ideology that seeks to subvert traditional conservativism based on the moral order of the universe (which is based on the teachings of Christ). This is a complete complete departure from traditional conservatism founded on Christian ethics. Yet Kristol’s idealistic heaven-on-earth does not work, since there is no way of adjudicating it against competing explanations, and here again we are back to covert Communistic idealism.

To preserve their agenda, whatever principles seem to fit their neoconservative mindset, they keep; whatever does not fit, they reject. This means that neoconservativism is continually being redefined, and Kristol foresaw that the term could even move to the next logical step—neoliberalism—which he defined as “neoconservatives who had been mugged by reality in Iraq.” Kristol makes things even more interesting by declaring, “I will take Bush over Kerry, but Kerry over Buchanan or any of the lesser Buchananites on the right…

Rabbinic Judaism has influenced Jewish revolutionaries to implement their messianic heaven on earth, and this world-view has always provoked anti-Jewish reactions, which are always detrimental for the Jewish people in general.